|
| |
|

|
LINK TESTING
LABORATORIES, INC.
13840 ELMIRA AVE. DETROIT, MICHIGAN
48227-3017
Phone (313)
933-4900 Fax (313) 933-0710
beep@linktestlab.com |
How To Read And Understand The Aftermarket Standard
SAE J2430/Brake Effectiveness Evaluation ProcedureÓ
Test Report
Analysis and decision-making tool for the brake industry
B.E.E.P.Ó
white paper 02-001
Link Testing
Laboratories B.E.E.P.
Ó
task force
|
|
How to
read and understand the
aftermarket standard
SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
test report
|
|
|
Formulators, process
designers, plant managers, application engineers, quality control
managers, purchasing agents and business unit managers can benefit from
SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
testing |
Introduction
Brake effectiveness
evaluation has always been a demanding automotive engineering task. The
introduction of the SAE-J2430 SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD in 1999 [1] and
the adoption of it by the Brake Manufacturers Council as the basis for
the Brake Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure for friction material used
on passenger cars and light truck brake systems makes this task easier.
It is a single-ended inertia dynamometer test reviewed and endorsed by
the brake industry and supported by almost 1,000 dynamometer tests and
50 fully instrumented vehicle tests.
The SAE J2430/B.E.E.P. Test
procedure resembles the main sections of the Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards 105 [2] and 135 [3]. Not having a reference material on
the other axle, it gives a high degree of repeatability and consistency
from test to test.
Further introduction of the
Brake Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure by the BMC friction materials
committee, creates a reliable framework to assess actual performance of
a friction material. The acceptance criteria are derived from the FMVSS
requirements and studies performed by the University of Michigan
Transportation Research Institute.
Driving forces for this
industry effort are: stringent new brake performance requirements,
increasing interest in the aftermarket customers in standardized test
procedures open to the industry as a way to reduce testing costs and
reduce development times, recent safety issues and the industry interest
in self-verification and overall technological improvement. |
|
|
The BMC/FMC recognizes and
supports the use of the
SAE J2430 as a basis for meeting the BMC/FMC objective |
"The BMC Friction Material
Committee resolves that aftermarket brake friction materials should not
deteriorate vehicle braking performance below the applicable federal
motor vehicle safety standard, and recognizes that on-vehicle,
dynamometer, or other equivalent testing, engineering or computer
analyses may be employed by manufacturers of replacement friction in
making good faith efforts to determine FMVSS performance."[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
This is a document for technical
reference only. Link Engineering Co., Link Testing Laboratories., Inc.
or the BMC shall be held harmless for product liability including, but
not necessarily limited to, product design, manufacture, performance and
acceptability for use. |
|
|
SAE J2430 tests friction
materials one at a time, following the market practice of changing brake
linings one axle at a time. |
Why a
SAE standard for dynamometer testing
“SAE J2430 is an improvement
over SAE J661/J866 as a friction material effectiveness characterization
test of replacement brake linings. SAE J661 uses a one-inch square
sample running against a large drum and is known to have shortcomings
for characterizing the vehicle performance of different types of
automotive brake linings.” [1]
A single-ended inertia
dynamometer test has among others, the following advantages over other
types of tests [5]:
·
Uses vehicle
specific hardware and test conditions derived from detailed vehicle
tests.
·
Tests only one
material at a time without the influence of a reference material on the
other axle that affects repeatability and accurate assessment of the
material tested.
·
Specifies, in
detail, control inputs and permits in-depth assessment on how the test
was performed. Brake cooling, which is critical in performance tests, is
also properly defined.
·
Cost-effective
when compared to a full vehicle test.
·
Developed in
more than 7 years of continuous testing and close analysis of results by
Original Equipment Manufacturers, suppliers, consultants and friction
manufacturers.
·
Takes advantage
of the expertise available through the SAE committees structure and
approach to develop and validate testing protocols with detailed peer
reviews in an open discussion forum. Periodical updates keep standards
current with the application and testing industry.
·
Can be run on
single-ended dynamometers. Single-ended dynamometers far exceed the
amount of dual-ended dynamometers available throughout the industry. |
|
|
Performance limits are
based on stopping distance and maximum pedal force defined on the
federal requirements. |
Why the
Brake Manufacturers Council performance limits?
As a second phase of the SAE
J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
program, the friction materials committee developed a set of criteria
consistent with the FMVSS vehicle test requirements [5]. SAE J2430 does
not include acceptance or performance limits, so its applicability for
effectiveness characterization required a mathematical modeling of the
vehicle dynamics and its corresponding relationship with the federal
stopping distance and pedal force requirements. The BMC also developed a
test report format in order to present test data in a consistent and
repeatable way. Performance criteria include [4]:
·
Average of ramp
applications should be within the FMVSS effectiveness space
requirements. Regressed specific torque within the limits allowed for
stopping distance requirements, maximum pedal force and brake balance.
Over-effective performance is also compared to maximum limits on pedal
force and deceleration limits.
·
Cold
Effectiveness and fade snubs within acceptable limits of deceleration
and maximum pedal force.
·
Hot
Effectiveness stops above the minimum deceleration requirements within
pedal force limits.
·
Post-test
structural integrity to assure friction material is able to go through
the test without mechanical failure or detachment from the backing
plate. |
|
|
Brake balance between
front and rear axles is the basic criteria for the inertia split
calculation
The BMC has external
consultants to audit how a valid test is run
Control program
parameters, performance limits and acceptance criteria are defined based
on the federal requirements, not the original equipment friction
material or any reference material |
How a
vehicle is made available for SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
testing
SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
testing requires specific test conditions and hardware information
before the actual test can be performed. Vehicles to be tested should
meet some initial criteria:
·
Current
production on-road vehicle
·
Up to 3,500 kg
gross vehicle weight
·
Be available
for the corresponding floor-checks and measurements
Vehicles can be added based
on BMC platform development committee request to any approved testing
facility or direct customer requirement as part of their engineering or
marketing validation programs. Link Testing Laboratories., Inc. also
develops vehicles independently to make them available to the industry
for regular testing.
Information is used to:
gather hardware information to build fixtures for front and rear axle
friction materials testing, define the required inertia for regular
testing based on brake balance, determine the vehicle specific
parameters for the control program and performance limits for the
acceptance criteria shown on the report. Procedures for obtaining the
vehicle information follow Federal Test Codes requirements. [5]. Vehicle
data can be grouped as follows:
·
Physical
dimensions and weights: wheelbase, tire rolling radius, brake effective
radius, brake disc or drum dimensions, center of gravity height, gross
and lightly loaded vehicle weight.
·
Hydraulic
system pressure levels with and without power assist, pressure profiles
for 135 N/s pedal force ramp rate, knee point when proportioning valve
available, booster runout pressure, pressure levels at 667 N and 500 N
pedal force for FMVSS 105 and 135 respectively certified vehicles and
1,000 N maximum pedal force corresponding pressure for the effectiveness
section per FMVSS pedal force limit.
·
Brake hardware
part numbers and FMSI identification for friction materials, both front
and rear.
Link Testing Laboratories,
Inc. performs internal testing using the original equipment friction
material to fine-tune the computer control program for the dynamometer
and have an exemplar data set to develop the test report format. Control
program parameters, performance limits and acceptance criteria are
defined based on the federal requirements, not the original equipment
friction material or any other friction product.
Other options to develop a
vehicle for regular SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
testing is via a testing program agreement with Link Testing
Laboratories., Inc.
Customers with floor check
capabilities and the proper inertia dynamometer with the technical
capabilities specified in the current SAE J2430 SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD
can develop vehicles for testing on their own.
Link Testing
Laboratories B.E.E.P.Ó
task force can
assist with training, control program development and screening programs
ranging from basic awareness sessions to full in-house testing
capabilities. |
|
|
SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
test can be used to characterize effectiveness on friction materials
-brake pad or brake lining- or components –rotors, drums, calipers-
|
What is
needed to perform a SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
test
Running a regular SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
on any of the available vehicles only requires sending parts, indicating
the amount of tests to be performed and arranging the test schedule by
phone or e-mail. Unlike other test procedures where test conditions may
vary from customer to customer, SAE J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
test conditions are pre-defined for each vehicle.
Parts required to run a test
are:
·
Friction
material for effectiveness characterization. Rotor or drum and hardware
used are original equipment level.
·
Rotor or drum
for effectiveness characterization. Friction material and hardware used
are original equipment level.
Test report is submitted in
Adobe Acrobat format along with a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
Typical turnaround for a SAE
J2430/B.E.E.P.Ó
test is one to two weeks. |
|
|
|
Brake
inertia dynamometers
Inertia dynamometers are
brake-testing equipment used to perform a variety of testing ranging from
quick friction coefficient analysis for coated rotors to FMVSS 105 or 135
simulations. Performance, durability, capacity and noise tests are the
most common tests performed.
Single-ended dynamometers
utilize brake components from one corner of the vehicle in order to
subject the components to a series of brake applications defined in the
test procedure. The vast majority of inertia dynamometers procedures (SAE,
JASO, ISO, AK, FMVSS, JIS or proprietary) used by original equipment
suppliers, friction vendors and component manufacturers are designed for
single-ended dynamometers.
Main components of an inertia
dynamometer are: main drive, inertia section, brake enclosure, cooling air
system, computer control console and fixture with brake components for
testing. The main drive accelerates the mass inertia that simulates the
vehicle’s kinetic energy and then the brake is applied to stop or reduce
the speed of the mass. The motor can be also used to drag the brakes to
simulate a constant downhill descent. If the brake is applied without
rotation, parking brake forces can be measured.
Typical sensors and signal
conditioning include channels for reading speed, torque, pressure, fluid
displacement and temperature. Noise testing requires a noise enclosure and
microphones for brake noise data collection.
Modern Inertia dynamometers are
controlled with Microsoft Widows based software and can simulate certain
levels of inertia. Pressure profiles and complex control algorithms are
also available.
Typical brake applications can
be controlled by pressure, torque, deceleration or drag by pressure.
The start of the brake
application can be by initial temperature or cycle time.
The release of the brake
application can be by speed, torque, temperature or elapsed time.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1.
SAE J2430 Test procedure outline |
|
Section |
# Of
Stops |
Initial-Release Speed (km/h) |
Control |
IBT (oC) |
Cycle
Time (s) |
|
|
0002:
Instrument Check
50 km/h Torque Control |
5 |
50-3 |
Torque @
0.31g |
<100 |
|
|
|
0003:
Instrument Check
100 km/h Torque Control |
5 |
100-3 |
Torque @
0.31g |
100 |
|
|
|
0004:
Instrument Check
Pressure Control |
3 |
50-3 |
Pressure @
75 N Pedal Force |
100 |
|
|
|
0005:
Instrument Check
50 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate
|
100 |
|
|
|
0006:
Instrument Check
100 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
|
100 |
|
|
None
Instrument Check
80 km/h Cooling Curve
|
18 |
80-80 |
Within
Cooling Band
|
200 for
Front
150 for
Rear |
15 |
|
|
0007:
Burnish |
200 |
80-3 |
Torque @
0.31g |
100 oC
or 97s |
|
|
0008:
Effect. #1. Post Burnish
50 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
100 |
|
|
|
0009:
Effect. #1. Post Burnish
100 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
100 |
|
|
|
0010: Post
Burnish
Cold Effectiveness |
6 |
100-3 |
Torque @
0.65 g |
100 |
|
|
|
0011: Fade
Heating Cycles |
15 |
120-56 |
Torque @
0.31g |
55 1st
Snub |
45 |
|
|
0012: Hot
Performance
Effectiveness |
2 |
100-3 |
1st
at minimum pressure from Section 0010.
2nd
at pressure corresponding to 500N Pedal Force for 135 Test / 667N
for 105 Test |
--- |
1st
at 35
2nd
at 30 |
|
|
0014:
Cooling Cycles |
4 |
50-3 |
Torque @
0.31g |
--- |
120 |
|
|
0015:
Recovery
100 km/h Ramp |
2 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
--- |
60 |
|
|
0016:
Reburnish |
35 |
80-3 |
Torque @
0.31g |
100 oC
1st Stop, 100 oC or 97s |
|
|
0017:
Final Effectiveness
50 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
100 |
|
|
|
0018:
Final Effectiveness
100 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
100 |
|
|
|
0019:
Final Effectiveness
160 km/h Ramp |
5 |
50-0.8 g
1,000 N
or 3 km/h |
135N/s
Pedal Apply Rate |
100 |
|
|
|
None Post
Test Cooling Curve
80 km/h |
18 |
80 km/h
constant |
Within
Cooling Band
|
200 for
Front
150 for
Rear |
15 |
|
|
None Post
Test Cooling Curve
112 km/h |
18 |
112 km/h
constant |
Within
Cooling Band
|
200 for
Front
150 for
Rear |
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|